Dimas

Dimas v. Costco Wholesale Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20232:21-cv-02006California2,530 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAYOLO DIMAS, on behalf of himself No. 2:21-cv-02006-TLN-JDP and others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER v.

COSTCO WHOLESALE

CORPORATION and EMPLOYBRIDGE HOLDING COMPANY dba SELECT STAFFING; Defendants. 18 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Costco Wholesale Corporation (“Costco”) and EmployBridge Holding Company dba Select Staffing’s (“Select Staffing”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Compel Arbitration. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff Mayolo Dimas (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 12.) Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 15.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion. /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On July 2, 2021, Plaintiff filed this putative class action against Defendants in San Joaquin County Superior Court alleging various state law wage and hour violations. (ECF No. 1.) On October 29, 2021, Defendants removed the action to this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.