Nance
Nance v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIFFENY NANCE, on behalf of No. 2:23-cv-00477-TLN-JDP herself and the Class Members, 12 Plaintiff, AMENDED PRETRIAL SCHEDULING v. ORDER
RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS,
INC., a Delaware Corporation; and RYDER SYSTEM, INC., a Florida Corporation,
Defendants.
18 After reviewing the parties’ Joint Statement of Case Type, 19 the Court hereby amends the Pretrial Scheduling Order.
I. SERVICE OF PROCESS
21 All named Defendants have been served and no further service 22 is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been 23 shown.
II. ADDITIONAL PARTIES/AMENDMENTS/PLEADINGS
25 No joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is 26 permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown. 27 /// 28 III. JURISDICTION/VENUE Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Jurisdiction and venue are not contested. 4 PHASE I - CLASS CERTIFICATION 6 IV. DISCOVERY The Court finds…