(PC) Hill v. Lynch

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 17, 20232:22-cv-01685California730 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CYMEYON V. HILL, No. 2:22-cv-01685-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER JEFF LYNCH, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. I. REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the February 8, 2023 order denying Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and ordering plaintiff to pay the $402.00 filing fee within fourteen days. A district court may reconsider a ruling under either Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) or 60(b). See Sch. Dist. Number. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993). “Reconsideration is appropriate if the district court (1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.