Munoz

(PC) Harris v. Munoz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20232:16-cv-00830California1,011 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GRADY HARRIS, No. 2:16-cv-0830 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. MUNOZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 30, 2022, defendants’ motions for summary judgment were granted in part and denied in part. (ECF Nos. 144, 145.) This case is now proceeding on plaintiff’s excessive force claims against defendants Munoz, Fong, and Williamson and on plaintiff’s failure to protect and excessive force claims against defendant Leavitt. On March 28, 2023, this court issued a further scheduling order. (ECF No. 156.) In that order, this court set deadlines for the parties to file pretrial statements. Plaintiff’s statement is due May 12. Plaintiff has filed motions seeking the appointment of counsel and a pretrial scheduling conference. (ECF Nos. 157, 158.) It appears that plaintiff had not received a copy of the court’s March 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.