(PC)Anderson

(PC)Anderson v. Sanborn

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20232:21-cv-00561California4,301 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KELVIN ANDERSON, No. 2:21-cv-00561-KJM-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS K.T. SANBORN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendant moves for summary judgment. ECF No. 24. For the reasons that follow, the motion must be granted as to plaintiff’s claims against defendants in their official capacities and otherwise denied. I. The Complaint The action proceeds on plaintiff’s amended complaint. ECF No. 10. That complaint alleges that plaintiff had knowledge of specific acts of misconduct by the defendants and that he was interviewed by Internal Affairs investigators about possible corruption and was later subjected to retaliation. Although that amended complaint contains some ambiguity as to what, if anything, plaintiff told the investigators, it alleges in relevant part that he had information…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.