Singh

BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Singh

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20231:23-cv-00067California662 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BMO HARRIS BANK N.A., national Case No. 1:23-cv-00067-BAM association, ORDER VACATING HEARING SET FOR Plaintiff, APRIL 28, 2023 13 v. ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING JASVINDER SINGH, an individual resident REGARDING MOTION FOR ENTRY OF and citizen of California dba NS DEFAULT JUDGMENT

TRANSPORT; DOES 1-10,

(Doc. 8)

Defendants. TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

18 On March 16, 2023, Plaintiff BMO Harris Bank N.A. (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion for entry of default judgment against Defendant Jasvinder Singh dba NS Transport (“Defendant”). (Doc. 8.) Following a preliminary review of the motion, the Court finds supplemental briefing is warranted. In deciding whether to grant or deny a default judgment, a court must assess the adequacy of the service of process on the party against whom default is requested. See, e.g., Trujillo v. Harsarb,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.