(PC) Valdez v. Wellpath Health Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20232:23-cv-00125California322 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND M. VALDEZ, No. 2:23-cv-0125 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND WELLPATH HEALTH INC., et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 On March 3, 2023, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the March 3, 2023 order was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.