Cryer
(PC) Robinson v. Cryer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFREY DONNELL ROBINSON Case No. 1:20-cv-00980-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART
v. DEFENDANTS’ EXHAUSTION-BASED
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT1
C. CRYER, et al., (Doc. No. 53) Defendant.
FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD
16 17 Pending before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants L. Merritt and K. Phui on January 18, 2023. (Doc. No. 53, “MSJ”). Plaintiff did not file any opposition and the time to do so has expired. See docket, see also L.R. 230(l). For the reasons below, the undersigned recommends the district court grant in part and deny in part Defendant’s MSJ.
23 //// //// //// 25 26 1 This matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302 27 (E.D. Cal. 2022). 28 2 Defendants note their intention to file a merits-based motion for summary judgment as to all three I. …