Weston

(PC) King v. Weston

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20231:20-cv-00943California11,028 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BARRY KING, Case No. 1:20-cv-00943-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

NAPHCARE, INC. ET AL., ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 61, 62) 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Barry King (“King”) filed the operative complaint in this case on July 7, 2020, in which he alleges that Defendants violated the Constitution and federal law in connection with treating him for injuries he sustained following his involvement in a high-speed vehicle chase with law enforcement on July 13, 2018. Following entry of stipulated orders to dismiss certain parties and claims (see ECF Nos. 19, 40), what remains is (1) King’s second cause of action alleging that Defendants Nurse Practitioner Robynn Weston (“NP Weston”), Dr. Naeem Siddiqi (“Dr. Siddiqi”) and their employer/agent Naphcare, Inc. (“Naphcare”) were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.