Marsh

Marsh v. Bank of Sierra, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 19, 20231:22-cv-00508California510 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERRANCE MARSH, Case No. 1:22-cv-00508-JLT-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING

WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE

13 v. IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY 14 BANK OF SIERRA, INC. et al. 21-DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendants. 16 On February 6, 2023, the Court found Plaintiff Terrance Marsh (“Plaintiff”) appeared to state a cognizable claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 against Defendants Bank of Sierra, Inc., Margaret Droese, and Karen Mitchell. (Doc. 15). On February 9, 2023, the Court issued an order directing the Clerk of Court to provide Plaintiff documents necessary for service including, three summons, three USM-285 forms, and instructions. (Doc. 16). The Court ordered Plaintiff to complete all necessary documents for service within 30 days from the date of the order. Id. at 2. On March 8, 2023, Plaintiff filed a timely notice of submission of documents. (Doc. 17). Plaintiff sent his completed documents to the Clerk of Court. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.