Quick
(PC) Torres v. Quick
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 EDWARD TORRES, Case No. 1:22-cv-01536-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT CERTAIN v. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED JAYSON QUICK, et al., (ECF Nos. 1 & 13) Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN DAYS
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN
DISTRICT JUDGE Edward Torres (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which includes state law claims.1 Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on November 30, 2022. (ECF No. 21 1). The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint. (ECF No. 13). The Court found that only the 22 following claims should proceed past the screening stage: Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment 23 excessive force claims against defendants Quick, Garza, Garcia, Valadez, Prince, and Martinez; 24 his Eighth Amendment…