Brandon

(PC) Martinez v. Brandon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 20, 20232:22-cv-01161California506 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CESAR ALEJANDRO MARTINEZ, No. 2:22-cv-1161 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

MARTIN BRANDON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that police officers used excessive force, retaliated, and discriminated against him in violation of his constitutional rights. By order dated January 31, 2023, the court screened and dismissed the amended complaint. (ECF No. 15.) Plaintiff was granted thirty days leave to file an amended complaint and advised that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Those thirty days have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, sought additional time to file an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the //// //// //// //// 1 || Court’s order.! Accordingly, the undersigned will…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.