Napear

Napear v. Bonneville Internat'l Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 20, 20232:21-cv-01956California8,996 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GRANT NAPEAR, No. 2:21-cv-01956-DAD-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

BONNEVILLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, (Doc. No. 13) 15 Defendant.

17 This matter is before the court on a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) filed on behalf of defendant Bonneville International Corporation. (Doc. No. 13.) The pending motion was taken under submission by the previously assigned district judge on August 15, 2022. (Doc. No. 35.) For the reasons explained below, defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s first amended complaint will be granted, with leave to amend. BACKGROUND On October 21, 2021, plaintiff Grant Napear filed this employment discrimination and retaliation lawsuit against defendant Bonneville International Corporation contending that he was terminated due to his religion, race, gender, and political views. (Doc. No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.