Capps

Capps v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20232:22-cv-00806California5,463 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KATHY CAPPS, et al, No. 2:22-cv-00806-DAD-JDP Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS,

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al INC.’S MOTION TO COMPEL

ARBITRATION AND STAYING COUNT VII

Defendants. (Doc. No. 32) 16 This matter came before the court on April 18, 2023, for a hearing on a motion to compel arbitration filed on behalf of defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian” or “EIS”). (Doc. No. 32.) Attorney Ryan McBride appeared by video for plaintiffs. Attorney John Vogt appeared by video on behalf of defendant Experian. For the reasons set forth below, defendant Experian’s motion will be granted. BACKGROUND On May 15, 2022, plaintiffs Kathy Capps and Loring Capps filed this action against defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”), Experian, and Trans Union, LLC. (Doc. No. 1.) The operative complaint contains seven causes of action. (Id.)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.