Sherman

(PC) Denham v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20231:20-cv-01645California3,050 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL JOHN DENHAM, Case No. 1:20-cv-01645-ADA-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND

v. REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

S. SHERMAN, et al., (Docs 41 & 42)

Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Paul John Denham is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION On March 28, 2023, Plaintiff filed “Plaintiff’s Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion for Appointment of Counsel” (Doc. 41) and “Plaintiff’s Notice of Motion and Motion for Appointment of Counsel Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(1)” (Doc. 42). In his motion, Plaintiff states (1) he is proceeding pro se “in forma pauperis in this action while incarcerated and indigent,”1 (2) staff shortages and prison lockdowns negatively impact his access to the law library, (3) “legal research computers are not equipped to accommodate” his 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.