(PS) Niravanh v. Durham

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 21, 20232:23-cv-00713California2,511 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEUANG LOTAKOON NIRAVANH, et No. 2:23-cv-00713-DAD-DMC al., 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ EX PARTE v. APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER ADRIANA DURHAM, et al., (Doc. No. 7) Defendants.

17 Plaintiffs Leuang Lotakoon Niravanh and Somsack Niravanh, proceeding pro se, initiated this civil action on April 18, 2023. (Doc. No. 1.) The matter is now before the court on the ex parte application for a temporary restraining order filed by plaintiffs on April 20, 2023. (Doc. No. 7.) For the reasons explained below, plaintiffs’ ex parte application will be denied. BACKGROUND According to the allegations in the complaint, plaintiffs filed this lawsuit alleging that their property located at 7906 Churn Creek Road, Redding, California (the “property”) was wrongly foreclosed upon. (Doc. No. 1 at 1.) Plaintiffs allege, among other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.