(PS) Pinzon v. CA Dept. Health Care Serv.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ABRAHAM G. PINZON, No. 2:23-cv-0008 DJC DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF HEALTH FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CARE SVCS.,

15 Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Abraham G. Pinzon. is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are plaintiff’s complaint, motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and motions to appoint counsel. (ECF Nos. 1, 2, 4 & 6.) The complaint consists of allegations asserted against the Northern District of California. The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). Here, plaintiff’s complaint is deficient. Accordingly, for the reasons stated below, the undersigned will recommend that…