Hudson

(PC) Springfield v. Hudson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20232:22-cv-00328California375 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CIRON B. SPRINGFIELD, No. 2:22-cv-0328 DAD CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS P. HUDSON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against three employees of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation: P. Hudson, S. Nguyen, and J. Smolinger. On March 30, 2023, the court screened plaintiff’s second amended complaint as the court is required to do under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Plaintiff was given two options: (1) proceed on a claim against defendants arising under the Eighth Amendment for subjecting plaintiff to harmful conditions of confinement on the day plaintiff attempted suicide (November 7, 2019); or (2) request permission to file a third amended complaint so that plaintiff could attempt to cure deficiencies in the second amended complaint. Plaintiff has elected to proceed on the claim described above. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.