Grannis

(PC) Branch v. Grannis

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20231:08-cv-01655California1,606 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LOUIS BRANCH, Case No. 1:08-cv-01655-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING MAY 10, 2023,

MOTIONS IN LIMINE HEARING

v. (ECF No. 386) D. UMPHENOUR,

ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S

Defendant. MOTIONS IN LIMINE

(ECF No. 396)

14 Louis Branch (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Defendant’s motions in limine, filed April 5, 2013. (ECF No. 396.) Plaintiff did not file an opposition and the time to so has passed. The Court deems the motions in limine submitted and the oral argument set for May 10, 2023, is vacated. I. LEGAL STANDARD “A motion in limine is a procedural mechanism to limit in advance testimony or evidence in a particular area.” United States v. Heller, 551 F.3d 1108, 1111 (9th Cir. 2009). A party may use a motion in limine to exclude…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.