Grannis
(PC) Branch v. Grannis
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LOUIS BRANCH, Case No. 1:08-cv-01655-SAB (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING MAY 10, 2023,
MOTIONS IN LIMINE HEARING
v. (ECF No. 386) D. UMPHENOUR,
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S
Defendant. MOTIONS IN LIMINE
(ECF No. 396)
14 Louis Branch (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Defendant’s motions in limine, filed April 5, 2013. (ECF No. 396.) Plaintiff did not file an opposition and the time to so has passed. The Court deems the motions in limine submitted and the oral argument set for May 10, 2023, is vacated. I. LEGAL STANDARD “A motion in limine is a procedural mechanism to limit in advance testimony or evidence in a particular area.” United States v. Heller, 551 F.3d 1108, 1111 (9th Cir. 2009). A party may use a motion in limine to exclude…