(PS) Van Den Heuvel v. Walmart Super Store
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL, Case No. 2:22-cv-00249-DJC-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED
v. COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED WITHOUT
LEAVE TO AMEND
WALMART SUPER STORE, et al., ECF No. 8 Defendants.
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS 17 Plaintiff has filed a first amended complaint that purports to assert claims against Walmart Super Stores, Karen Roberts, and other individual defendants. Like the initial complaint, the amended complaint does not state a cognizable claim. Since plaintiff has not remedied the deficiencies highlighted in the prior screening order, I will recommend that the amended complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. Screening and Pleading Requirements A complaint must contain a short and plain statement that plaintiff is entitled to relief, Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2), and provide “enough facts to state a…