Trujillo

Trujillo v. Chaudhary

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20231:22-cv-00969California1,063 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE TRUJILLO,

9 Case No. 1:22-cv-00969-SKO Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE

v. SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION

HARBIR CHAUDHARY, individually and dba 99 Food Market & Gasoline, et al., 14 DAY DEADLINE Defendants.

14 On August 3, 2022, Plaintiff Jose Trujillo (“Plaintiff”) filed his Complaint against Defendants Harbir Chaudhary and Ved Vati Chaudhary (aka Ved Vati Rana), both individually and doing business as 99 Food Market & Gasoline (“Defendants”), alleging claims under the American with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), and California’s Health and Safety Code. (Doc. 1). These claims stem from alleged barriers Plaintiff encountered (such as a lack of accessible parking) while he visited a facility owned, operated, or leased by Defendants—99 Food Market & Gasoline. (See id.) No defendant has appeared in this action, and default has been entered. (Docs. 7, 8.) On April 20, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion for default…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.