(SS) Peek v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20231:21-cv-01828California4,238 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VIRGINIA PEEK, Case No. 1:21-cv-01828-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING

v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT, AND AFFIRMING THE

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SOCIAL SECURITY1

SECURITY, (Doc. Nos. 14, 16) Defendant. 17 Virginia Peek (“Plaintiff”), seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. (Doc. No. 1). The matter is currently before the undersigned on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted without oral argument. (Doc. Nos. 14, 16). For the reasons set forth more fully below, the Court denies Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, grants Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and affirms the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.