Covello

(HC) Trevino v. Covello

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 24, 20231:23-cv-00441California845 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT TREVINO, Case No. 1:23-cv-00441-SAB-HC

Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

v. AS UNTIMELY

PATRICK COVELLO,

Respondent.

14 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases requires preliminary review of a habeas petition and allows a district court to dismiss a petition before the respondent is ordered to file a response, if it “plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. On April 24, 1996, Congress enacted the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”). AEDPA imposes a one-year period of limitation on petitioners seeking to file a federal petition for writ of habeas corpus. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.