Clendenin

(PC) Bodnar v. Clendenin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20232:22-cv-01533California5,447 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS BODNAR, No. 2:22-cv-1533 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER STEPHANIE CLENDENIN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a civilly committed individual proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. I. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). ECF No. 2. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. II. Statutory Screening The federal in forma pauperis statute authorizes federal courts to dismiss a case if the action “(i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). //// A claim “is [legally] frivolous where it lacks an arguable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.