Sanders
Sanders v. Hicks
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PHILLIP SANDERS, Case No. 1:22-cv-00577-JLT-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE
COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE
v. DISMISSED AS TIME BARRED AND FOR
LACK OF JURISDICTION
SHERIFF ROBERT HICKS, ET AL, May 26, 2023, DEADLINE Defendants.
16 17 18 Plaintiff, Philip Sanders, who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis initiated this action on May 13, 2022, by filing a civil complaint. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). Plaintiff’s Complaint is before the Court for screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). I. Screening Requirement Because Plaintiff is proceeding in form pauperis, the Court may dismiss a case “at any time” if the Court determines, inter alia, the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state claim on which relief can be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) -(iii); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F. 3d 1122, 1129…