Sanders

Sanders v. Hicks

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20231:22-cv-00577California2,202 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PHILLIP SANDERS, Case No. 1:22-cv-00577-JLT-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED AS TIME BARRED AND FOR

LACK OF JURISDICTION

SHERIFF ROBERT HICKS, ET AL, May 26, 2023, DEADLINE Defendants.

16 17 18 Plaintiff, Philip Sanders, who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis initiated this action on May 13, 2022, by filing a civil complaint. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). Plaintiff’s Complaint is before the Court for screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). I. Screening Requirement Because Plaintiff is proceeding in form pauperis, the Court may dismiss a case “at any time” if the Court determines, inter alia, the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state claim on which relief can be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) -(iii); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F. 3d 1122, 1129…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.