Briggs

Briggs v. Fenstermaker

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20231:23-cv-00146California462 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOHNNY LEE BRIGGS, Case No. 1:23-cv-00146-JLT-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING AMENDED FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL AND

v. DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

DAVID FENSTERMAKER, ET AL., (Docs. 13, 14, 15) Defendants.

15 Johnny Lee Briggs initiated this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on January 31, 2023, against David Fenstermaker, the Community Regional Medical Center, and the Medical Board of Examiners. (Doc. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Eastern District of California Local Rule 302. The assigned magistrate judge screened the complaint, found Plaintiff’s claims were Heck-barred,1 and issued findings and recommendations to dismiss the complaint, without prejudice. (Doc. 11.) Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations and then filed a first amended complaint. (Docs. 12, 13.) After screening…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.