Goodwin

Goodwin v. Royal Properties

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20231:23-cv-00260California1,933 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DUCHUN LAFRE GOODWIN, Case No. 1:23-cv-00260-ADA-HBK Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT ROYAL PROPERTIES, VICTORIA May 26, 2023 DEADLINE BRAMBLE, and ANGELA HILL, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, Duchun Lafre Goodwin (“Goodwin”), who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this action on February 21, 2023 by filing a form “Complaint for a Civil Case.” (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). Plaintiff’s Complaint is before the Court for screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). I. Screening Requirement Because Plaintiff is proceeding in form pauperis, the Court may dismiss a case “at any time” if the Court determines, inter alia, the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state claim on which relief can be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) -(iii); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F. 3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.