Arnold

Arnold v. Stearns Lending Services, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20231:22-cv-01534California1,226 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIMBLY ARNOLD and BYRON Case No. 1:22-CV-01534-JLT-SKO

ARNOLD,

ORDER REMANDING CASE Plaintiffs, 13 v. 14 STEARNS LENDING SERVICES LLC, et al., Defendants. 17 18 LoanCare LLC removed this action from Stanislaus County Superior Court to this Court citing federal question jurisdiction as the sole basis for the removal. (Doc. 1 at 2–3.) This Court ordered Defendant to show cause why this case should not be remanded sua sponte to state court. Defendant filed a response, and the Plaintiffs. (Doc. 13; Doc. 15.) Having considered the entire record, the Court concludes that remand is required. For the sake of expedience, the Court repeats here the pertinent parts of its OSC: Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction and may adjudicate only those cases authorized by federal law. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994); Willy v. Coastal Corp., 503 U.S. 131, 136–37 (1992). “Federal courts are presumed to lack …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.