Neuschmid

(HC) Sisounthone v. Neuschmid

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20232:18-cv-03181California3,279 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VANNA SISOUNTHONE, No. 2:18-cv-3181 DAD AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ROBERT NEUSHCMID, Warden, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The case was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Before the court is respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition on the grounds that it contains unexhausted claims. ECF No. 10. The motion is fully briefed. See ECF Nos. 15 (petitioner’s opposition), 16 (respondent’s reply). Also before the court is petitioner’s request for an extension of time to file (1) “objections” to the court’s “findings and recommendations” and (2) a request for a certificate of appealability. ECF No. 25. I. PETITIONER’S MOTION Petitioner requests extended time to object to findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.