Davis

Davis v. Walmart Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20231:22-cv-01381California696 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT DONALD DAVIS, Case No. 1:22-cv-01381-ADA-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

v. DEFENDANT ANGIE CARRELES WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

WALMART, INC. and ANGIE CARRELES, (Doc. 19) 15 Defendants. 16 17 This action was removed from state court to this Court on October 26, 2022. (Doc. 1). On March 28, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge convened the parties for a scheduling conference. (Doc. 17). Defendant Angie Carreles, whom the docket reflects neither has been served nor appeared in the action, did not appear at the scheduling conference. Thereafter, the Court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to show cause in writing within seven days why Defendant Carreles should not be dismissed due to Plaintiff’s failure to timely effect service pursuant to Rule 4(m), Fed. R. Civ. P. (Doc. 18). Because Plaintiff did not timely respond to the order to show cause, on April 7, 2023, the magistrate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.