E.E.

E.E. v. Norris School District

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 27, 20231:20-cv-01291California9,134 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 E.E., a minor, by and through his guardian CASE NO. 1:20-CV-1291 AWI CDB ad litem, LAURA HUTCHINSON- ESCOBEDO; CHRISTOPHER ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR ESCOBEDO; and LAURA SUMMARY JUDGMENT HUTCHINSON-ESCOBEDO

Plaintiffs

v. (Docs. 75 and 77) NORRIS SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Defendant I. Background Plaintiff E.E. is a minor who has been diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Plaintiffs Laura Hutchinson-Escobedo and Christopher Escobedo (“Parents”) are E.E.’s parents. Plaintiffs live in Bakersfield, CA, within the boundaries of Defendant Norris School District (“NSD”). E.E. started attending kindergarten at Norris Elementary in August 2018. E.E.’s old Individualized Education Plan (“Old IEP”) allowed E.E. to take part in a general education classroom for 98% of the time with 2% of his time spent on speech and language services. The Parents agreed to the Old IEP and it was implemented starting on November 27, 2018 and 23 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.