Hill

(PC) Davis v. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 27, 20232:22-cv-00407California533 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LLOYD CLIFTON DAVIS, Case No. 2:22-cv-00407-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RICK HILL, et al., Defendants. 16 On December 14, 2022, I screened plaintiff’s second amended complaint and notified him that the claims could not proceed together in the same action. ECF No. 13. I granted him thirty days to file an amended complaint or advisement indicating his intent to stand by his current complaint, subject to a recommendation that claims, or parties be dismissed. I also warned him that failure to comply with the December 14 order could result in dismissal of this action. Id. at 4. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint. Accordingly, on March 3, 2023, I ordered him to show cause within twenty-one days why this action should not be dismissed. ECF No. 14. I notified him that if he wished to continue with this action he must file, within twenty-one days, an amended complaint or advisement of his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.