Borges

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT COFFMAN, Case No. 1:23-cv-00012-CDB

Plaintiff,

SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

v.

FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE THIS ACTION AND TO

BORGES, ET AL,

COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS

Defendants.

THREE-DAY DEADLINE

16 Plaintiff filed a complaint on January 3, 2023. (Doc. 1). That same day, the Clerk of Court issued summonses and the Court entered an Order setting a mandatory scheduling conference. (Docs. 2, 3). The Order directed Plaintiff to “diligently pursue service of summons and complaint” and “promptly file proofs of service.” (Doc. 3). The Order further advised Plaintiff that failure to diligently prosecute this action “may result in the imposition of sanctions, including the dismissal of unserved defendants.” Id. On March 17, 2023, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why sancitons should not be imposed for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action and to comply with the Court’s order. (Doc. 4). …