(PS) Ringgold v. Burgett Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD RINGGOLD, No. 2:22-cv-00836-DAD-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER BURGETT, INC., doing business as (ECF No. 46) PIANODISC, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Edward Ringgold proceeds pro se with claims against his former employer, Burgett, Inc., doing business as Pianodisc. (ECF No. 19, Operative First Amended Complaint.)1 On March 28, 2023, the undersigned denied plaintiff’s motion to strike defendant’s answer, or, in the alternative, to require verification with declarations by the owners of Burgett, Inc. (ECF No. 45.) In the present motion, plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the denial of the alternate request for relief requiring declarations signed under penalty of perjury for defendant’s answer. (ECF No. 46.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the court takes the motion under submission on the record and briefs on file. The hearing set for May 10, 2023, is vacated. For the reasons set forth below, the motion for reconsideration is denied. 27…