(PC) Rannels v. Smith

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20231:21-cv-00049California2,000 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL W. RANNELS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00049-ADA-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD

v. NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO

OBEY COURT ORDERS

SMITH, et al.,

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

Defendants. FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

WITHIN 21 DAYS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE

COURT TO RE-SERVE SECOND

SCREENING ORDER

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR THE

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

20 Plaintiff Daniel W. Rannels is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On February 2, 2023, the Court issued its Second Screening Order. (Doc. 19.) The Court determined Plaintiff’s first amended complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. (Id. at 4-7.) The Court directed Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint curing the 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.