Savoie

(PC) Cruz v. Savoie

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20231:19-cv-01024California1,132 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GUILLERMO TRUJILLO CRUZ, Case No. 1:19-cv-01024-ADA-HBK (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

v. (Doc. No. 38) S. SAVOIE,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

Defendant. F OR EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. No. 39)

19 Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. No. 38) and Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. No. 39). For the reasons set forth below, the court denies Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel and grants Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Guillermo Trujillo Cruz is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights complaint, alleging various claims against Defendant S. Savoie under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. Nos. 25, 34). The court screened Cruz’s initial complaint and determined the complaint failed to state a cognizable claim. (See generally…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.