Sherman

(PC) Wilson v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20231:22-cv-00874California2,103 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID W. WILSON, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00874 JLT SKO (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

v. PROTECTION ORDER

STUART SHERMAN, et al., (Doc. 20)

Defendants.

Plaintiff David W. Wilson is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION On March 3, 2023, Plaintiff filed “Plaintiff’s Motion for Protection Order Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c); L.R. 37-251(a).” (Doc. 20.) Plaintiff seeks a “PROTECTION ORDER for all Legal Documents, and for Single Cell, for imminent danger Transfer where conspiracy was undertaken to place plaintiff as Enhanced Out Patient (EOP) by Psychologist ….” (Id. at 1.) Plaintiff contends that on February 8, 2023, he was called in to see a psychologist but refused to do so. (Doc. 20 at 2.) On February 14, 2023, Plaintiff again refused to see the psychologist, stating “95%…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.