Hurtado

(PC) Adkins v. Hurtado

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20232:21-cv-00531California554 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DUPREE LAMONT ADKINS, Case No. 2:21-cv-00531-DJC-JDP (HC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR

v. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION BE DENIED DAVID HURTADO & E. MARSHAK, ECF No. 55 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff alleges that defendants violated his rights by denying him access to the law library because of his race. ECF No. 41 at 6-8. He has filed a motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order that requests that he be granted priority library user time at the California Medical Facility, where the events of this lawsuit transpired. ECF No. 55. The motion also requests the production of unredacted documents and the administration of a polygraph examination. Id. at 17. I recommend that this motion be denied. As an initial matter, defendants point out that plaintiff is no longer incarcerated at the California Medical Facility, and his request for library time at that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.