(PS) Van den Heuvel v. El Dorado County Transit
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEAN MARC VAN DEN HUEVEL, No. 2:22–cv–1734–DAD–KJN PS Plaintiff, ORDER v. EL DORADO COUNTY TRANSIT, et al., Defendants. 16 In September of 2022, plaintiff, who is proceeding without counsel, filed his claims against defendant El Dorado County Transit, who waived service in February 2023. On April 10, defendant filed a motion to dismiss, noticing the motion for a June 6, 2023 hearing before the undersigned. (ECF No. 11.) Under the court’s Local Rules, plaintiff was to respond to defendant’s motion at least fourteen days after the motion was filed: or April 24, 2023. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(c) (“Opposition, if any, to the granting of the motion shall be in writing and shall be filed and served not less than fourteen (14) days after the motion was filed.”). A review of the court’s docket reveals plaintiff failed to do so by the deadline. Further, plaintiff filed a document entitled “copy of email” where he appears to acknowledge to defendant that…