McQuennie

McQuennie v. Wells Fargo Institutional Retirement Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20231:22-cv-00557California4,397 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEPHEN MCQUENNIE, Case No. 1:22-cv-00557-JLT-SKO Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

THAT PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED WITHOUT

LEAVE TO AMEND

WELLS FARGO INSTITUTIONAL RETIREMENT SERVICES, et al., (Doc. 14) 15 Defendants. 21-DAY DEADLINE

17 On May 10, 2022, Plaintiff Stephen McQuennie, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a complaint against Defendants Wells Fargo Institutional Retirement Services (“Wells Fargo”) and Principal Financial Group (“Principal”). (Doc. 1). On August 12, 2022, the undersigned screened the complaint, found that it failed to state any cognizable claims, and granted Plaintiff thirty days leave to file an amended complaint curing the pleading deficiencies identified in the order. (Doc. 5.) On September 2, 2022, Plaintiff filed a document titled “First Amended Complaint,” but the substance of the document appeared to indicate that he wished to stand on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.