McQuennie
McQuennie v. Wells Fargo Institutional Retirement Services
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEPHEN MCQUENNIE, Case No. 1:22-cv-00557-JLT-SKO Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
THAT PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED
v. COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED WITHOUT
LEAVE TO AMEND
WELLS FARGO INSTITUTIONAL RETIREMENT SERVICES, et al., (Doc. 14) 15 Defendants. 21-DAY DEADLINE
17 On May 10, 2022, Plaintiff Stephen McQuennie, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a complaint against Defendants Wells Fargo Institutional Retirement Services (“Wells Fargo”) and Principal Financial Group (“Principal”). (Doc. 1). On August 12, 2022, the undersigned screened the complaint, found that it failed to state any cognizable claims, and granted Plaintiff thirty days leave to file an amended complaint curing the pleading deficiencies identified in the order. (Doc. 5.) On September 2, 2022, Plaintiff filed a document titled “First Amended Complaint,” but the substance of the document appeared to indicate that he wished to stand on…