Anderson

(PC) Brackett v. Anderson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20232:21-cv-02282California1,292 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEMOND CHARLES BRACKETT, Case No. 2:21-cv-02282-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v.

WENDELL ANDERSON, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff, an inmate in the Yuba County Jail, brings his third amended complaint. ECF No. 38. I have reviewed it and determined that, for screening purposes only, he may proceed on his Sixth Amendment claims against Sheriff Wendell Anderson. All other claims and defendants should be dismissed. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that seeks relief against a governmental entity, officer, or employee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. §§…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.