Clendenin

(PC) Forster v. Clendenin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20231:22-cv-01191California4,557 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA FORSTER, Case No.: 1:22-cv-01191 CDB (PC) Plaintiff,

FIRST SCREENING ORDER

v.

STEPHANIE CLENDENIN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Joshua Forster is a civil detainee1 proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the complaint is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). The Court should dismiss a complaint if it lacks a cognizable legal theory or fails to allege sufficient facts to support a cognizable legal theory. See Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep’t, 901 F.2d 696,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.