Block

Block v. Grocery Plus LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20231:23-cv-00201California185 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HENDRIK BLOCK, Case No. 1:23-cv-00201-ADA-EPG Plaintiff, Vv. ORDER RE: NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

GROCERY PLUS LLC, et al., (ECF No. 14) Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs notice of voluntary dismissal (ECF No. 14), 18 with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(@), as Defendants have 19 not filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment. In light of the voluntary dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(), and has been dismissed with prejudice. See Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case. Additionally, the pending findings and recommendations (ECF No. 13) to decline supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim are vacated as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 ag Dated: …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.