Kim
(PC) Fox v. Kim
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL FOX, Case No. 1:20-cv-00290-JLT-CDB (PC)
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
TO GRANT DEFENDANT’S MOTION
v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ERNEST ZEIGLER, (Doc. 38)
Defendant.
FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE
16 Plaintiff Michael Fox is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s claims of Eighth Amendment medical indifference and medical malpractice under California law against Defendant Ernest Zeigler, R.N. All claims against Dr. Kim have been dismissed. Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment (Doc. 38). Plaintiff filed a response in opposition (Doc. 47), to which Defendant filed a reply (Doc. 48). For the following reasons, the Court recommends that summary judgment be granted in Defendant’s favor. I. UNDERLYING FACTS A. Defendant’s Statement of Undisputed Facts and…