(PC)Perez

(PC)Perez v. Sandoval

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 2, 20231:22-cv-00391California1,561 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADRIAN PEREZ, Case No. 1:22-cv-00391-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO

v. OBEY COURT ORDERS AND FAILURE

TO PROSECUTE

SANDOVAL, et al., 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD Defendants. Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge 16 Plaintiff Adrian Perez is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION On March 10, 2023, the Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 8.) The Court determined Plaintiff’s complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. (Id. at 4-7.) The Court directed Plaintiff to file a first amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified in the order, or to file a notice of voluntary dismissal within 21 days of service of the order. (Id. at 8.) A docket entry dated March 20, 2023, reflects the Court’s screening order was returned by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.