Arnold
(PC) Walker v. Arnold
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DERIK NATHANIEL WALKER, No. 2:19-cv-0185 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS E. ARNOLD, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (“SAC”), ECF No. 31, is now before the court for screening. This is the third complaint to have been screened in this case. See ECF Nos. 1, 16 (original complaint and first screening); 20, 28 (first amended complaint and second screening); 31 (second amended complaint). For the reasons stated below, the undersigned will recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. I. STATUTORY SCREENING OF COMPLAINT The court is required to screen…