Kersh

(PC) Green v. Kersh

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20232:22-cv-01053California686 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JARVON D. GREEN, Case No. 2:22-cv-01053-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER R. KERSH, et al., Defendants. 16 I screened plaintiff’s § 1983 complaint and found that he alleged cognizable claims for excessive force against defendant Kersh and due process violations against defendant Alkire. ECF No. 9. I notified him that his other claims were not cognizable and gave him the option to amend his complaint or to notify the court that he wished to proceed on his cognizable claims. Id. Plaintiff filed a notice with the court that he elected to proceed on the cognizable claims, ECF No. 10, and concurrently filed a first amended complaint, ECF No. 11, which only alleged the claims previously found cognizable. I directed service, and defendants Kersh and Alkire answered on January 19, 2023. ECF No. 24. I then stayed the case and referred it to the court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution program. ECF No. 26. On March 3, 2023, before the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.