Riebe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD D. CASITY, Case No. 2:22-cv-02181-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER TODD RIEBE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Richard Casity is a state inmate proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleges in his first amended complaint that his son-in- law, defendant Matthew Riebe, violated his constitutional rights. As stated in my previous screening order, plaintiff’s claims are non-cognizable. I will grant him one final opportunity to amend his complaint. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen a prisoner’s complaint that seeks relief against a governmental entity, officer, or employee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any portion of the complaint that is frivolous or malicious, that fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seeks monetary relief from a…