Warden

(HC) Jones v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 2, 20232:22-cv-02010California1,462 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 COREY THOMAS JONES, No. 2:22-cv-2010 AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

WARDEN, Respondent. 15 Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and paid the filing fee. I. Background On April 25, 2012, a jury found petitioner guilty of conspiracy to commit armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 213(a), (b). ECF No. 1-1 at 2-3. During sentencing, the judge determined that petitioner was a career offender and he was sentenced to concurrent terms of 60 months for the conspiracy and 200 months for the armed bank robbery. Id. at 2-3, 7. II. The Petition Petitioner does not challenge the validity of his convictions. Instead, argues that under Mathis v. United States, 579 U.S. 500 (2016), and Descamps v. United States, 570 U.S. 254…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.