(PC) Valencia v. San Juan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20231:22-cv-00360California784 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 CHRISTOPHER G. VALENCIA, Case No. 1:22-cv-00360-JLT-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-

v. OPPOSITION DEFENDANT’S MOTION

FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS (FINAL

DEBORAH SAN JUAN, EXTENSION)

15 Defendant. 16 Christopher Valencia (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 19, 2023, Defendant filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings. (ECF No. 36). Plaintiff was required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion within twenty-one days. Local Rule 230(l). On February 10, 2023, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time, giving him until March 30, 2023, to respond to Defendant’s motion. (ECF No. 39). On March 17, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to respond to Defendant’s motion and to file four…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.